Scientific paper ID 1500 : 2017/3
FIELDS OF APPLICATION OF THE PRIMARY LINING IN THE TUNNELING

Nevena Ivaylova Babunska-Ivanova

To prevent the destruction of underground excavation under the influence of rock pressure and provide safe working conditions to build a permanent lining of the facility, tunnel excavation is support. Modern supporting systems are d as a component of the permanent lining and in this sense they are treated as primary lining.

The primary lining in tunnels consists of various elements, depending on the category and quality of the rock mass. To determine the fields of application of the primary lining has been compared one of the most commonly classifications of rock mass in tunnel construction - Protodiakonov and Lauffer, NATM, RMR, Q, GSI and RQD parameter. The relationship between RQD and RMR has been determined using collected data from real objects from the world practice and correlation and regression analysis has been done. On the base on the determined relationship and the cited references are draw graphics that are presented and compared to those classifications and RQD, according to the category and quality of the rock mass. According to the graphics has been made decision of the individual classifications in the construction of a tunnel for a specific amount of RMR, determined on the basis of individual parameters. Using a comparative graph of classifications has been developed a table in which are presented the types of primary lining used in the construction of tunnels.


тунели класификации скален масив първична облицовкаtunnels classification rock massif primary liningNevena Ivaylova Babunska-Ivanova

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] Totev Y. i kolektiv. Normi za proektirane na patni i zhelezopatni tuneli, 1988.
( [1] Тотев Й. и колектив. Норми за проектиране на пътни и железопътни тунели, 1988. )

[2] Rabcewicz L.V. The New Austrian Tunneling Method, Part One, Water Power, Vol.16, N11, pp.453-457, 1964.

[3] Bieniawski Z.T., Tunnel Design by Rock Mass Classifications, Technical Report, 1990.

[4] Barton N., R. Lien, J. Lunde. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mechanics 6, pp.189-236, Springer-Verlag, 1974.

[5] Hoek E. Practical Rock Engineering, 341 р., http://www.rocscience.com/hoek/PracticalRoc...

[6] Zhang L. Determination and applications of rock quality designation RQD. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 8 pp.389-397, 2016.

[7] Raiz A., S.Jamil, M. Asif, K. Akhtar. Tunnel Support Design by Comparison of Empirical and Finite Element Analysis of the Nahakki Tunnel in Mohmand Agency, Pakistan. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 75-84, 2016.

[8] Manquehual C. Head Race Tunnel Melado Hydropower Plant, Chile. Optimization in Excavation and Rock Support. MSc thesis, 416 р., 2012.

[9] Rasool D., Z. Hoseeinmirzall. Determination strength parameters rock masses Jajarm tunnel based on geotechnical study. JBES, Vol.4, №6, pp.495-502, 2014.

[10] Ivanov V. Izsledvane na opasnostta ot skalni udari pri izrabotvaneto na Madanskoto rudno pole. Godishnik na MGU, Tom 52, Sv. II, s. 55-61, 2009.
( [10] Иванов В. Изследване на опасността от скални удари при изработването на Маданското рудно поле. Годишник на МГУ, Том 52, Св. II, с. 55-61, 2009. )

[11] Dimitrov S. Primerno prilozhenie na edinichna lineyna regresiya i korelatsiya v transportnite izsledvaniya s izpolzvane na MS Excel. Sp. Mehanika, transport, komunikatsii, br.2, №0479, s. 3-10÷3-16, “VTU Todor Kableshkov“, 2010.
( [11] Димитров С. Примерно приложение на единична линейна регресия и корелация в транспортните изследвания с използване на MS Excel. Сп. Механика, транспорт, комуникации, бр.2, №0479, с. 3-10÷3-16, “ВТУ Тодор Каблешков“, 2010. )

[12] Dimitrov S. Primerno prilozhenie na edinichna lineyna regresiya i korelatsiya v transportnite izsledvaniya. Sp. Mehanika, transport, komunikatsii, br.2, №0478, s. 3-1÷3-8, “VTU Todor Kableshkov“, 2010.
( [12] Димитров С. Примерно приложение на единична линейна регресия и корелация в транспортните изследвания. Сп. Механика, транспорт, комуникации, бр.2, №0478, с. 3-1÷3-8, “ВТУ Тодор Каблешков“, 2010. )

[13] Dodge Y. The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics. Appendix C: Fisher Table for α=0.05, p.590, ISBN: 978-0-387-32833-1, Springer 2008.

[14] Babunska-Ivanova N. Opredelyane na vzaimovrazkata mezhdu RMR i Q sistemite pri stroitelstvoto na tuneli. XXII Mezhdunarodna nauchna konferentsiya “TRANSPORT 2017“, VTU “Todor Kableshkov“ (pod pechat).
( [14] Бабунска-Иванова Н. Определяне на взаимовръзката между RMR и Q системите при строителството на тунели. XXII Международна научна конференция “ТРАНСПОРТ 2017“, ВТУ “Тодор Каблешков“ (под печат). )

[15] Bieniawski Z. T. Cycle of Lectures. Academia Gorniczo-Hutnicza, Krakow, Oct. 2010.

[16] Hoek E., P. Kaiser, W. Bawden. Support of Underground Excavations in Hard Rock. ISBN10 9054101873, 225 р., A. A. Balkema, 1995.

[17] Osgoui R., E. Ünal. Rock reinforcement design for unstable tunnels originally excavated in very poor rock mass. Underground Space Use: Analysis of the Past and Lessons for the Future – Erdem & Solak, London, ISBN 04 1537 452 9, pp.291-296, 2005.

[18] Zhang L. Engineering Properties of Rocks. Second Edition. ISBN: 978-0-12-802833-9, 378 р., Elsevier, 2017.

[19] Ali W., N. Mohammad, M. Tahir. Rock Mass Characterization for Diversion Tunnels at Diamer Basha Dam, Pakistan – a design perspective. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology, Volume No.3, Issue No.10, pp. 1292-1296, 2014.

[20] Ceballos F., C. Olalla, R. Jiménez. Relationship between RMRb and GSI based on in situ data. Proceedings of EUROCK 2014 ISRM European Symposium, pp.375-380, 2014.

[21] Beshevliev Iv., D. Hvarlev, A. Yanev, Zh. Dobrev, A. Rumenov. Retrospektsiya otnosno prouchvaniya, proekti i izpalneniya na tuneli i pryako svarzani s nyakoi ot tyah obekti, v perioda 1950÷2011 g., Sofiya 2010.
( [21] Бешевлиев Ив., Д. Хвърлев, А. Янев, Ж. Добрев, А. Руменов. Ретроспекция относно проучвания, проекти и изпълнения на тунели и пряко свързани с някои от тях обекти, в периода 1950÷2011 г., София 2010. )

[22] Grimstad E., N. Barton. Updating of the Q-System for NMT. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sprayed Concrete, Fagernes, pp.46-66, 1993.

[23] Aşçioğlu G. Analysis of Support Design Practice at Elmalik Portals of Bolu Tunnel, Thesis, Middle East Technical University, 211 р., 2007.

[24] NGI. Using the Q-system. Rock mass classification and support design, 54p., 2015, www.ngi.no

[25] Romana M. Update of 1989 Bieniawski’s RMR guidelines for tunnel excavation and support. Proceedings of EUROCK 2014 ISRM European Symposium, pp.1139-1144, 2014.

 

 

 

This site uses cookies as they are important to its work.

Accept all cookies
Cookies Policy