MODELS FOR QUALITY MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS ASSESSMENT OF THE TEACHER”S ACTIVITY AT UNIVERSITIES

Nina Gergova; Maria Hristova

Scientific paper ID 1415 : 2017/1

MODELS FOR QUALITY MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS ASSESSMENT OF THE TEACHER”S ACTIVITY AT UNIVERSITIES

Nina Gergova, Maria Hristova

One of the reasons for the low motivation of teachers at universities is the lack of effective relationship between results and the remuneration they receive. In the present publication, various approaches and methods for quality assessment are studied. A mechanism for objective personal assessments is proposed. The author has chosen to apply a model for quality measurement and results assessment of the teacher”s activity. The model isbased on the understanding that ”if everything is done in the right way, then the results achieved are qualitative”.

• Reload article • Open/Download as PDF

качество обучение резултати модел показатели индикаториquality; training; results; model; indicatorsNina Gergova Maria Hristova

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] Strategiya za razvitie na vissheto obrazovanie na R. Balgariya za perioda 2014 – 2020, http://www.mon.bg/?go=page&pageId=74&am...
( [1] Стратегия за развитие на висшето образование на Р. България за периода 2014 – 2020, http://www.mon.bg/?go=page&pageId=74&am... )

[2]Mertens D. M., Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods, SAGE Publications, 2014

[3] Frazer, M., Models for Quality of Evaluation, Electronic Proceedings. First National Scientific Conference on Quality of Higher education, 2006

[4] George F., Madaus M., Scriven D., L. Stufflebeam, Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

[5] Manatos М., C. Sarrico, & M. Rosa, The Integration of Quality Management in Universities, An Analysis Based on Quality Policy Statements, Higher Education Research in the 21st Century Series, pp. 143-158, 2015

[6] TodorovaD., KolevP., GergovaN.,Kachestvo obucheniya i konkurentosposobnost Vysshego transportnogo uchilishta im. Todora Kableshkova na rynke obrazovatelnyh uslug, X Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya, „Pravovyye i upravlencheskie problemy deyatelnosti gosudarstva i hozyaystvuyushtih subektov: rossiyskiy i mezhdunarodnyy opyt”, Domodedovo, Sbornik BBN 978-5-4253-0802, Moskva, Integratsiya UDK 338.24 (082), str. 16, 2015
( [6] TodorovaD., KolevP., GergovaN.,Качество обучения и конкурентоспособность Высшего транспортного училища им. Тодора Каблешкова на рынке образовательных услуг, X Международная научная конференция, „Правовые и управленческие проблемы деятельности государства и хозяйствующих субьектов: российский и международный опыт”, Домодедово, Сборник БBN 978-5-4253-0802, Москва, Интеграция УДК 338.24 (082), стр. 16, 2015 )

[7] Chuchalin, A.I., Boev, O.V., Kriushova, A.A., Kachestvo inzhenernogo obrazovaniya: Balans interesov na osnove kompetentsiy. Mezhdunarodnyy simpozium Kachestvo vysshego obrazovaniya i podgotovki spetsialistov k professionalnoy deyatelnosti”, 2005
( [7] Чучалин, А.И., Боев, О.В., Криушова, А.А., Качество инженерного образования: Баланс интересов на основе компетенций. Международный симпозиум Качество высшего образования и подготовки специалистов к профессиональной деятельности”, 2005 )

[8] Hristova M., Hristov H., University Management stimulating higher Education Quality, Journal MEST (Management, Education, Science & Society, Technology),VOL 4, № 2, DOI 10.12709/mest.04.04.02.11, 103-112, www.mest.meste.org, 2016

[9] Staykov Iv., Kolichestveni metodi v upravlenieto, Akademichno izdatelstvo„D. A. Tsenov“, 2005
( [9] Стайков Ив., Количествени методи в управлението, Академично издателство„Д. А. Ценов“, 2005 )

[10] Beshelev, S.D., Gurvich, F.G., Matematiko-statisticheskie metody ekspertnyh otsenok. Moskva, Statistika,1980
( [10] Бешелев, С.Д., Гурвич, Ф.Г., Математико-статистические методы экспертных оценок. Москва, Статистика,1980 )

[11] Litvak, B.G., Ekspertnyye otsenki i prinyatie resheniy. 1996
( [11] Литвак, Б.Г., Экспертные оценки и принятие решений. 1996 )

[12] Mariya Hristova, Kolichestveni metodi za otsenyavane i upravlenie na kachestvoto na obuchenie vav visshite uchilishta, Disertatsiya (Avtoreferat) za prisazhdane na obrazovatelna i nauchna stepen „doktor” po nauchnata spetsialnost „Avtomatizirani sistemi za obrabotka na informatsiya i upravlenie (obrazovanie)”, 2007
( [12] Мария Христова, Количествени методи за оценяване и управление на качеството на обучение във висшите училища, Дисертация (Автореферат) за присъждане на образователна и научна степен „доктор” по научната специалност „Автоматизирани системи за обработка на информация и управление (образование)”, 2007 )

[13] Tsinidou M., V. Gerogiannis, P. Fitsilis, „Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study“, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 18 Iss: 3, pp.227 – 244, 2010

[14] I. Zhelezarov, Sistema za kontrol i izmervane na kachestvoto na obuchenie vav visshite tehnicheski uchilishta. TU-Gabrovo, Disertatsiya za nauchnata stepen„doktor“, 2005
( [14] И. Железаров, Система за контрол и измерване на качеството на обучение във висшите технически училища. ТУ-Габрово, Дисертация за научната степен„доктор“, 2005 )

[15] Akinbolu, Judy, J. Duffy, Fr. Good, A. Brown, Review of performance indicators - Consultation to inform the review. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, 2007

[16] Ho, William, Prasanta K. Dey, Helen E. Higson, Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, (20), 5, p.319- 337, 2006